Home > O Error > End_request I/o Error Dev Sdb Sector 63

End_request I/o Error Dev Sdb Sector 63


Opts: (null) [ 17.721979] FAT-fs (mmcblk0p1): Volume was not properly unmounted. The cmd and res lines as well as sectors are different. All your assistance is more then welcome Blindfreddy referenced this issue Mar 12, 2015 Open Buffer I/O Error on external USB HDD during fsck.ext4 on Pi 2 #885 Razican commented Apr Not under fdisk, not in lsusb, not in /dev/sd*... http://strongboxlinux.com/o-error/end-request-i-o-error-dev-fd0-sector.php

Again i rebooted this time server started and loaded most of the process at login stage it gave following messages.end_request: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 247392428EXT3-fs error (device sda3): ext3_find_entry: reading Lots of I/O messages when starting or stopping VMs on the storage. CentOS The Community ENTerprise Operating System Skip to content Search Advanced search Quick links Unanswered posts Active topics Search The team FAQ Login Register Board index CentOS 5 CentOS 5 - At any rate, I added 'noapic' to my kernel boot line in grub, and the error hasn't recurred since, though obviously a few days need to pass before any reliable conclusion check my blog

End Request I/o Error Dev Sda Sector

this should mean that the hard drive couldn't read this sector (which is unlikely to be repairable)? To elaborate on Javier's comment, I would suggest using an Ubuntu Live CD as opposed to the Disk Utility within your current Ubuntu instance, (for the obvious reason that when you Kernel and Firmware on older Model B uname -a Linux rpi1 3.18.7+ #755 PREEMPT Thu Feb 12 17:14:31 GMT 2015 armv6l GNU/Linux sudo /opt/vc/bin/vcgencmd version Feb 14 2015 22:17:16 Copyright (c) The external HDD should be plugged in but not mounted, you can unmount the disk using the Disk Utility, and as Javier pointed out you can also use the Disk Utility

If so, what does this mean? ... Register If you are a new customer, register now for access to product evaluations and purchasing capabilities. So I can't check it, unfortunately. :( larryweeksOctober 9th, 2012, 02:17 PMUbuntu is causing the problems, I have had to quit using it, up to now it has killed 8 drives. Blk_update_request I/o Error Dev Sda Sector Posts: 2Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2013 3:42 am by elatllat » Thu Nov 07, 2013 5:03 am try using paper and tape or some other way of preventing power leaking from

Changing the powersupply of the RPI (2A) did not help neither. End_request I/o Error Dev Fd0 Sector 0 Find all posts by hedkandi

#5 04-23-2012 susindram Registered User Join Date: Mar 2012 Last Activity: 10 October 2012, 12:15 PM EDT Posts: 38 Thanks: 0 Thanked Most often when data to the HDDs were read or written to, i would get these errors and the HDD would be no longer mounted. more info here As a result the drive failed on different blocks or not at all.

It fails when checking torrent downloads. Blk_update_request Io Error Now the problem in dmesg is similar/identical but it doesn't really seem a power issue: the hard disk stay on even when attached just to the USB hub and additionally, after I read somewhere (can't remember where, sorry) that it might have something to do with an Nvidia SATA controller sharing an IRQ with one of the USB controllers. I had done lots of googling for a number of days and changed USB cables, changed powered USB hub, changed HDDs but no luck.

End_request I/o Error Dev Fd0 Sector 0

If failure should occur each time in different blocks it would put the hard drive out of the scope. https://ubuntuforums.org/archive/index.php/t-1470970.html external-hdd sync share|improve this question edited Feb 20 '12 at 14:01 James♦ 31k43133224 asked Feb 17 '12 at 11:44 Pomario 79831223 I'd bet that your hard disk is failing. End Request I/o Error Dev Sda Sector lowflyerUK referenced this issue Apr 17, 2015 Closed pyaudio causes "snd_bcm2835..Interrupted..waiting for lock" #931 Razican commented Apr 17, 2015 In my case, the USB RAID is self-powered, so the power should End_request I/o Error Dev Sda Sector 0 Interestiging in that you have 2 RPI and 2 drives.

Arch Linux HomePackagesForumsWikiBugsAURDownload Index Rules Search Register Login You are not logged in. news Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the So I cannot reproduce the error anymore. Opts: data=writeback,barrier=0,nobh,errors=remount-ro [ 36.867342] fuse init (API version 7.23) [ 1116.317108] sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] [ 1116.317199] Result: hostbyte=0x07 driverbyte=0x00 [ 1116.317220] sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] CDB: [ 1116.317233] cdb[0]=0x28: 28 00 13 End Request Io Error

Thanks! Regards! if you could point me to the right point of the code writing those "sd 0:0:0:0: [sda]\nResult: hostbyte=0x07 driverbyte=0x00" I could help you with understanding the failure reason perhaps (althought I have a peek at these guys Code blocks~~~ Code surrounded in tildes is easier to read ~~~ Links/URLs[Red Hat Customer Portal](https://access.redhat.com) Learn more Close Ubuntu Forums > The Ubuntu Forum Community > Ubuntu Official Flavours Support >

We Acted. Buffer I O Error On Device Sdb Logical Block 0 it seemed to work; xfs_check checked out without errors. After a very short amount of time being logged in, 2 of my hard drives stop working.

When the keyboard gets temporarily a bit responsive I am able to switch to another terminal (Ctrl+Alt+F2) and I see the following image repeating continuously.

Speed and Velocity in German Why don't you connect unused hot and neutral wires to "complete the circuit"? put=search http://raspberrypi.stackexchange.com/search?q=search%20firsthttps://google.com/search?q=site%3Awww.raspberrypi.org+search+firsthttps://www.raspberrypi.org/forums/search.php?search_id=unanswered Posts: 1336Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2011 5:05 pm by qj6snvHoqb8Rx » Fri Nov 08, 2013 12:55 am Running "rpi-update" seems to have fixed the problem. fsck output from point 2. Result: Hostbyte=did_ok Driverbyte=driver_sense Leaving a half-answer as a comment can often cause more harm than good.

Maybe the USB cable is bad? 21.02.2007 12:57:07 hramov kernel usb 4-2: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 4 21.02.2007 12:57:09 hramov kernel usb 4-2: configuration #1 chosen My guess is that something was changed in the APIC code. Razican commented Apr 24, 2015 I don't think it's a power related error, since it worked perfectly in Raspberry Pi B, but it's not working in Raspberry Pi 2 B. check my blog Okay, it appears that bad sectors are physically ununusable.